fishing: be to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to humans 1.00
have harmful to oceans animals gear 0.77
be fantastic to human beings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, be to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subject, be fantastic to human beings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fishing, be to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fishing, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fishing, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fishing, have harmful to oceans animals gear)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, have harmful to oceans animals gear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fishing, be to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subject, be fantastic to human beings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(fishing, be to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subject, be fantastic to human beings)