fishing: be to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to science 1.00
relate to physical science 0.85
be scientific 0.83
is scientific 0.83
is mathematics 0.82
is when mathematics 0.81
be to math 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(subject, is mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fishing, be to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(subject, is when mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fishing, be to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(subject, is when mathematics)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(subject, is mathematics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(subject, is mathematics)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(subject, is when mathematics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(subject, is mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(subject, is when mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fishing, be to science)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fishing, relate to physical science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fishing, relate to physical science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fishing, relate to physical science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fishing, relate to physical science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fishing, be to math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fishing, be to math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be scientific)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fishing, be scientific)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing, be scientific)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fishing, be scientific)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fishing, be to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, is mathematics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(subject, is when mathematics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, is mathematics)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fishing, be to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(subject, is when mathematics)