fishmonger: wear wellies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.46
, person
Weight: 0.44
, trade
Weight: 0.25
, fish
Weight: 0.24
Siblings butcher
Weight: 0.31
, fisherman
Weight: 0.30
, plumber
Weight: 0.30
, beggar
Weight: 0.29
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear wellies 1.00
wear white wellies 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(butcher, wear wellies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(butcher, wear white wellies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(butcher, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(butcher, wear wellies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(butcher, wear white wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(butcher, wear white wellies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fishmonger, wear wellies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fishmonger, wear white wellies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear white wellies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fishmonger, wear white wellies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fishmonger, wear white wellies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishmonger, wear wellies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(butcher, wear wellies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fishmonger, wear wellies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(butcher, wear white wellies)