flame: be better than yellow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.56
, attack
Weight: 0.55
, source
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.53
Siblings torch
Weight: 0.63
, lighter
Weight: 0.51
, bunsen burner
Weight: 0.49
, light source
Weight: 0.32
, burning man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than yellow 1.00
be hotter than red 0.84
be hotter than yellow flames 0.78
be hotter than red flame 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(flame, be better than yellow)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(flame, be hotter than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(flame, be hotter than red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(flame, be hotter than red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(flame, be hotter than yellow flames)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(flame, be hotter than yellow flames)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(flame, be hotter than red flame)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(flame, be hotter than red flame)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(flame, be hotter than yellow flames)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(flame, be hotter than red flame)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(flame, be hotter than red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(flame, be hotter than red flame)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flame, be hotter than yellow flames)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(flame, be better than yellow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flame, be better than yellow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(flame, be better than yellow)