flank: has physical part region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.60
, cut
Weight: 0.47
, force
Weight: 0.46
, position
Weight: 0.45
, steak
Weight: 0.43
Siblings corner
Weight: 0.33
, zone
Weight: 0.32
, slope
Weight: 0.32
, town square
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part region 1.00
has physical part zone 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(zone, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(zone, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zone, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(flank, has physical part region)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flank, has physical part zone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(flank, has physical part zone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(flank, has physical part zone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(flank, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flank, has physical part region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(flank, has physical part region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flank, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(zone, has physical part zone)