flash memory: be considered non volatile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents random access memory
Weight: 0.78
, memory
Weight: 0.72
, disk drive
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.68
Siblings disk
Weight: 0.36
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.35
, computer disk
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered non volatile 1.00
is non volatile 0.98
be considered volatile 0.96
is volatile 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(random access memory, is volatile)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(random access memory, is volatile)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(random access memory, is volatile)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(random access memory, is volatile)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(flash memory, be considered non volatile)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, be considered volatile)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, is non volatile)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(flash memory, be considered volatile)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(flash memory, is non volatile)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(flash memory, is non volatile)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, is volatile)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(flash memory, be considered volatile)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(flash memory, is volatile)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flash memory, is non volatile)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(flash memory, be considered volatile)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(flash memory, is volatile)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flash memory, is volatile)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(random access memory, is volatile)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(flash memory, be considered non volatile)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(random access memory, is volatile)