flash: crashing in internet explorer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, light
Weight: 0.58
, hero
Weight: 0.57
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.34
, light bulb
Weight: 0.33
, blue light
Weight: 0.33
, black light
Weight: 0.33
, light switch
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
crashing in internet explorer 1.00
keep crashing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tool, keep crashing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flash, crashing in internet explorer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tool, keep crashing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tool, keep crashing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.14
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tool, keep crashing)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(flash, crashing in internet explorer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(flash, crashing in internet explorer)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(flash, keep crashing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(flash, keep crashing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flash, keep crashing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(flash, keep crashing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(flash, crashing in internet explorer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flash, crashing in internet explorer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tool, keep crashing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(flash, crashing in internet explorer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tool, keep crashing)