flatulence: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.50
, stomach
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings constipation
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.34
, nausea
Weight: 0.34
, irritation
Weight: 0.33
, sneezing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
jokes 0.94
is funny 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, is funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sneezing, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(sneezing, is funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(flatulence, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(flatulence, jokes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(flatulence, jokes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(flatulence, jokes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flatulence, jokes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flatulence, is funny)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(flatulence, is funny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(flatulence, is funny)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(flatulence, is funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flatulence, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(flatulence, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flatulence, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sneezing, is funny)