flea: be attracted to white socks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.58
, parasite
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.52
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, ladybug
Weight: 0.32
, honey bee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to white socks 1.00
be attracted to white 0.87
be attracted to color white 0.86
be attracted to color 0.82
be attracted to water 0.77
has color white 0.77
be attracted to light 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(insect, be attracted to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(insect, be attracted to light)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insect, be attracted to light)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, be attracted to white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has color white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(insect, be attracted to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ladybug, be attracted to white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ladybug, be attracted to white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(ladybug, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(flea, be attracted to white socks)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(flea, be attracted to water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(flea, be attracted to water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to color)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to white)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(insect, be attracted to light)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ladybug, be attracted to white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ladybug, has color white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flea, be attracted to white socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(insect, be attracted to light)