flight: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents direct flight
Weight: 0.78
, travel
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.61
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings takeoff
Weight: 0.59
, fly
Weight: 0.57
, national capital
Weight: 0.43
, air travel
Weight: 0.35
, travel agency
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
get more expensive 0.97
is more expensive now 0.97
is in expensive 0.94
is expensive 0.94
dushanbe expensive 0.93
be more expensive year 0.93
is expensive now 0.92
get expensive 0.91
be more expensive on days 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direct flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(flight, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direct flight, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(flight, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(direct flight, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(direct flight, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(direct flight, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(direct flight, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direct flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direct flight, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(flight, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(air travel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(flight, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flight, is expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(flight, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flight, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(flight, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(flight, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direct flight, is more expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direct flight, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air travel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direct flight, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(flight, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direct flight, is expensive)