flip flop: cause heels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crap
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.61
, shoe
Weight: 0.60
, circuit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings flop
Weight: 0.66
, hot day
Weight: 0.52
, big bang
Weight: 0.33
, light switch
Weight: 0.33
, hop
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause heels 1.00
cause cracked heels 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(flop, cause heels)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(flop, cause cracked heels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(flop, cause heels)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(flop, cause cracked heels)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(flop, cause cracked heels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(flip flop, cause heels)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(flip flop, cause cracked heels)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(flip flop, cause cracked heels)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause cracked heels)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(flip flop, cause cracked heels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(flip flop, cause heels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(flop, cause heels)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, cause heels)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(flop, cause cracked heels)