flip: has physical part back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents camera
Weight: 0.54
, trick
Weight: 0.53
, move
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.45
, coach
Weight: 0.41
Siblings digital camera
Weight: 0.31
, camera lens
Weight: 0.31
, slide
Weight: 0.31
, push button
Weight: 0.30
, light switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part back 1.00
has physical part eye 0.83
were back then 0.81
get over time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, were back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flip, has physical part back)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(device, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flip, has physical part back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(camera, were back then)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(device, get over time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camera, were back then)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(device, get over time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(camera, were back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(flip, has physical part back)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(device, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(flip, has physical part back)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(flip, has physical part back)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flip, has physical part back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flip, has physical part back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(device, get over time)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camera, were back then)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(device, get over time)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(flip, has physical part back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camera, were back then)