flood: be called disaster

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.63
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cyclone
Weight: 0.49
, hurricane
Weight: 0.35
, storm
Weight: 0.35
, earthquake
Weight: 0.34
, tornado
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called disaster 1.00
has state disaster 0.95
is natural disaster 0.94
be called floods 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hazard, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(flood, be called disaster)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hazard, be called disaster)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hazard, be called disaster)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(earthquake, has state disaster)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, has state disaster)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cyclone, is natural disaster)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hazard, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(flood, be called disaster)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cyclone, is natural disaster)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cyclone, is natural disaster)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cyclone, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cyclone, has state disaster)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(earthquake, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(earthquake, has state disaster)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(flood, be called disaster)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(flood, has state disaster)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flood, is natural disaster)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(flood, be called floods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called floods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flood, is natural disaster)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(flood, be called disaster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hazard, be called disaster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cyclone, is natural disaster)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cyclone, has state disaster)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(earthquake, has state disaster)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(flood, be called disaster)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hazard, be called disaster)