flood: cutting down trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.63
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cyclone
Weight: 0.49
, hurricane
Weight: 0.35
, storm
Weight: 0.35
, earthquake
Weight: 0.34
, tornado
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cutting down trees 1.00
affect trees 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tornado, affect trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tornado, affect trees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tornado, affect trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(flood, cutting down trees)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(flood, affect trees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flood, affect trees)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(flood, affect trees)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(flood, affect trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(flood, cutting down trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(flood, cutting down trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(flood, cutting down trees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tornado, affect trees)