floor: is wet todd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents second floor
Weight: 0.76
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ground floor
Weight: 0.87
, top floor
Weight: 0.82
, balcony
Weight: 0.66
, basement
Weight: 0.65
, carpeting
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wet todd 1.00
is wet todd sweater 0.88
get wet 0.79
has state wet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(basement, has state wet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(basement, get wet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(basement, get wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(basement, get wet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(basement, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(basement, has state wet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(floor, is wet todd)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(floor, is wet todd sweater)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(floor, is wet todd sweater)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(floor, is wet todd sweater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd sweater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(floor, has state wet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(floor, has state wet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(floor, has state wet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(floor, has state wet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(floor, is wet todd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(basement, get wet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(floor, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(basement, has state wet)