flop: were called flip flops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.51
, pair
Weight: 0.44
, player
Weight: 0.42
Siblings big bang
Weight: 0.31
, cd player
Weight: 0.31
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.31
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.31
, horror movie
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were called flip flops 1.00
were called flops 0.94
go flip flop 0.90
go flop 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(flop, were called flip flops)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(flop, were called flops)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flop, go flip flop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flop, were called flops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(flop, go flop)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(flop, go flip flop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(flop, go flip flop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(flop, were called flops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(flop, go flop)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(flop, go flop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(flop, go flip flop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(flop, were called flops)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(flop, go flop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(flop, were called flip flops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flop, were called flip flops)