florida: was named

Related concepts

Parents	north carolina Weight: 0.71 , california Weight: 0.70 , south carolina Weight: 0.70 , ohio Weight: 0.69
Siblings	walt disney world Weight: 0.62 , georgia Weight: 0.62 , tennessee Weight: 0.61 , indiana Weight: 0.58 , spoonbill Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was named	1.00
was became state	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(california, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(florida, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(california, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(california, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(california, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(florida, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(tennessee, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(tennessee, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(florida, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(florida, was became state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(florida, was became state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(florida, was became state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(florida, was became state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(florida, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(california, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(tennessee, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(florida, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(california, was named)