flour: be good for burns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.64
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.60
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wheat flour
Weight: 0.75
, wheat
Weight: 0.36
, bread
Weight: 0.36
, rice
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for burns 1.00
burn 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(flour, be good for burns)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(food, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(food, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bread, burn)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(flour, be good for burns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bread, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bread, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(flour, be good for burns)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(flour, burn)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(flour, burn)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(flour, burn)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(flour, burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flour, be good for burns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(flour, be good for burns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bread, burn)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(flour, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)