flower: be important to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motif
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.64
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.63
, token
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.76
, hyacinth
Weight: 0.76
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to plants brainly 1.00
be important to plants 1.00
be on plants 0.95
help plants 0.93
be necessary for plants 0.92
be important to plant 0.92
be helpful to plants 0.91
be important part of plant 0.90
allow plants 0.89
is plant 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(flower, be important to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important to plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important part of plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(flower, be important to plant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(flower, be important part of plant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(flower, is plant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(flower, is plant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(flower, is plant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(flower, is plant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flower, be important to plant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(flower, be important part of plant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(flower, be important part of plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(flower, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plants)