flower: die

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motif
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.64
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.63
, token
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.76
, hyacinth
Weight: 0.76
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
die 1.00
die in water 0.92
die in wonder 0.84
die song 0.84
die in vase 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(daisy, die)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, die)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(daisy, die in wonder)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(daisy, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(daisy, die)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hydrangea, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, die)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(daisy, die in wonder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(daisy, die in wonder)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(flower, die)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(flower, die in water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(flower, die in water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(flower, die in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(flower, die in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(flower, die)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(daisy, die)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hydrangea, die)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(flower, die) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(daisy, die in wonder)