foam: be heavier than air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be heavier than air 1.00
be much darker than lower surface 0.81
be much darker than surface 0.77
alch for less 0.77
be colder than surfaces 0.77
be colder than dark surfaces 0.76
stay cooler than dark ones 0.75
be worse than plastic 0.75
be better than aluminum 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surface, be much darker than lower surface)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(surface, be colder than surfaces)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(surface, be colder than surfaces)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(surface, be much darker than lower surface)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(surface, be colder than surfaces)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surface, be much darker than lower surface)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be worse than plastic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be better than aluminum)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(surface, be much darker than lower surface)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(surface, be colder than surfaces)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(styrofoam, be worse than plastic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be worse than plastic)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(fiberglass, be better than aluminum)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be better than aluminum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(foam, be heavier than air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foam, be heavier than air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(surface, be colder than surfaces)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(surface, be much darker than lower surface)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be worse than plastic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be better than aluminum)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(surface, be colder than surfaces)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surface, stay cooler than dark ones)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(surface, be much darker than lower surface)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foam, be heavier than air)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(surface, be colder than dark surfaces)