foam: be stronger barrier to magnetic field

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger barrier to magnetic field 1.00
is magnetic 0.83
have magnetic properties weak 0.80
have magnetic properties too weak 0.79
have magnetic properties 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(material, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(material, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(material, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(styrofoam, is magnetic)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is magnetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(foam, be stronger barrier to magnetic field)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(material, is magnetic)