foam: being damaged by loud noises

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
being damaged by loud noises 1.00
being damaged by noises 0.97
is loud 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is loud)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is loud)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is loud)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(foam, being damaged by loud noises)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(foam, being damaged by noises)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, being damaged by noises)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, being damaged by noises)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(foam, being damaged by noises)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, being damaged by loud noises)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(foam, being damaged by loud noises)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, being damaged by loud noises)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is loud)