fob: stop working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, term
Weight: 0.46
, item
Weight: 0.45
, jewelry
Weight: 0.42
, band
Weight: 0.41
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.30
, t shirt
Weight: 0.29
, earring
Weight: 0.29
, lock
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop working 1.00
stopped working 0.91
work 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lock, stop working)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lock, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lock, stop working)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lock, stop working)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lock, work)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lock, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fob, stop working)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fob, stopped working)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fob, stopped working)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fob, stopped working)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fob, stopped working)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fob, work)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fob, stop working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fob, stop working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lock, stop working)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fob, stop working)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lock, work)