fog: be in newfoundland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.63
, bad weather
Weight: 0.62
, film
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings raining
Weight: 0.35
, snow
Weight: 0.35
, traffic light
Weight: 0.34
, sleet
Weight: 0.34
, darkness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in newfoundland 1.00
be more seen in high places 0.77
be more seen in places 0.76
be present during middle of day 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fog, be in newfoundland)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fog, be present during middle of day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fog, be present during middle of day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fog, be present during middle of day)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fog, be more seen in high places)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fog, be more seen in high places)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fog, be more seen in high places)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fog, be present during middle of day)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fog, be more seen in places)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(fog, be more seen in places)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fog, be more seen in high places)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fog, be more seen in places)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fog, be more seen in places)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fog, be in newfoundland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fog, be in newfoundland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fog, be in newfoundland)