foo: heated up taste better than cold food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, file
Weight: 0.49
, argument
Weight: 0.44
, name
Weight: 0.42
, bar
Weight: 0.41
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, foo fighters
Weight: 0.32
, oh
Weight: 0.31
, bing
Weight: 0.31
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
heated up taste better than cold food 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(foo, heated up taste better than cold food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(foo, heated up taste better than cold food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(foo, heated up taste better than cold food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(foo, heated up taste better than cold food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(foo, heated up taste better than cold food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(foo, heated up taste better than cold food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(foo, heated up taste better than cold food)