food can: be at supermarket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.66
, container
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.37
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, kosher food
Weight: 0.35
, garbage can
Weight: 0.35
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at supermarket 1.00
be at grocery store 0.91
be used to store food 0.83
be at store 0.83
be at shop mall 0.81
be buy in store 0.78
be at shop 0.76
be at pet store 0.76
be used to store good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(product, be buy in store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(container, be used to store good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(product, be buy in store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(container, be used to store good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(container, be used to store good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(product, be buy in store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be at supermarket)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at shop mall)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be at pet store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(product, be buy in store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(container, be used to store good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pet food, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pet food, be at supermarket)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food chain, be at shop mall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be at shop mall)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pet food, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pet food, be at pet store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(food can, be at supermarket)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food can, be at grocery store)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(food can, be at grocery store)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(food can, be used to store food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at grocery store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(food can, be at grocery store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to store food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to store food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(food can, be used to store food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be buy in store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(container, be used to store good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be at supermarket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pet food, be at pet store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at shop mall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be buy in store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(container, be used to store good)