food chain: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related with ecosystem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food chain, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(food chain, be related with ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food chain, be related with ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be related with ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(food chain, be related with ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food chain, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food chain, be related)