food chain: be related to food webs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to food webs 1.00
become food webs 0.95
have important webs 0.92
have similar webs 0.90
form food web 0.78
be different than food web 0.77
differ from food web 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(food chain, become food webs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(food chain, become food webs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have important webs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have similar webs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(food chain, become food webs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(food chain, form food web)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be different than food web)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, be different than food web)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(food chain, become food webs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, differ from food web)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, differ from food web)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(food chain, form food web)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(food chain, differ from food web)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(food chain, be different than food web)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(food chain, form food web)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(food chain, form food web)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(food chain, differ from food web)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food chain, be different than food web)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(food chain, have similar webs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(food chain, have similar webs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(food chain, have important webs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(food chain, have similar webs)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food chain, have important webs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(food chain, have important webs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)