food: be at market

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at market 1.00
be buy at market 0.94
be at farmer market 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be at market)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be at market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at market)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be buy at market)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(food, be buy at market)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(food, be at farmer market)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(food, be buy at market)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(food, be at farmer market)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food, be at farmer market)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(food, be at farmer market)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be buy at market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, be at market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(food, be at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, be at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be at market)