fool: is bad word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wise man
Weight: 0.56
, jerk
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.55
, song
Weight: 0.54
Siblings anyone
Weight: 0.59
, anybody
Weight: 0.55
, believer
Weight: 0.54
, wrong
Weight: 0.51
, dirk
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad word 1.00
is word 0.94
is noun 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(song, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fool, is bad word)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(song, is noun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(song, is noun)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(song, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fool, is bad word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fool, is bad word)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fool, is word)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fool, is word)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(fool, is word)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fool, is noun)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fool, is noun)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fool, is bad word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fool, is bad word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(song, is noun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fool, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(song, is noun)