foot: be at grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, height
Weight: 0.59
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.60
, toe
Weight: 0.57
, blister
Weight: 0.53
, heel
Weight: 0.50
, skate
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grind 1.00
step on grind 0.88
be motivated by there be snow in grind 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(skate, be motivated by there be snow in grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(skate, be motivated by there be snow in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(skate, be motivated by there be snow in grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(foot, be at grind)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(foot, step on grind)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(foot, step on grind)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(foot, step on grind)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(foot, step on grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(foot, be at grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(skate, be motivated by there be snow in grind)