foot: be at sock

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, height
Weight: 0.59
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.60
, toe
Weight: 0.57
, blister
Weight: 0.53
, heel
Weight: 0.50
, skate
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sock 1.00
be at shoe and sock 0.95
be used to put sock on 0.93
be used to put shoe on 0.77
be at bottom of shoe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toe, be at sock)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heel, be at bottom of shoe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(toe, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(toe, be at sock)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(heel, be at bottom of shoe)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(heel, be at bottom of shoe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(foot, be at sock)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(foot, be used to put sock on)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(foot, be at shoe and sock)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at shoe and sock)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(foot, be at shoe and sock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(foot, be used to put shoe on)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(foot, be used to put sock on)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to put shoe on)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(foot, be at shoe and sock)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(foot, be used to put shoe on)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(foot, be used to put sock on)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(foot, be used to put sock on)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foot, be used to put shoe on)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at sock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foot, be at sock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(toe, be at sock)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foot, be at sock)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(heel, be at bottom of shoe)