foot: be referred to to dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.63
, spot
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.60
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.60
, toe
Weight: 0.57
, blister
Weight: 0.53
, skate
Weight: 0.48
, callus
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred to to dogs 1.00
be called dogs 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(toe, be called dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(toe, be called dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toe, be called dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(foot, be referred to to dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(foot, be called dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(foot, be called dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(foot, be called dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(foot, be called dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(foot, be referred to to dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foot, be referred to to dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(foot, be referred to to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(toe, be called dogs)