foot: burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.63
, spot
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.61
, condition
Weight: 0.60
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.60
, toe
Weight: 0.57
, blister
Weight: 0.53
, skate
Weight: 0.48
, callus
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn 1.00
feel like burning 0.84
burn in diabetes 0.80
burn in heels 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(toe, burn)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(callus, burn)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(blister, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(blister, burn)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blister, burn)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(callus, burn)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(callus, burn)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toe, burn)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(toe, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(foot, burn)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn in heels)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(foot, burn in heels)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(foot, burn in heels)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(foot, burn in heels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(foot, burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(blister, burn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(callus, burn)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foot, burn)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(toe, burn)