footprint: be at roof

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.56
, fossil
Weight: 0.54
, evidence
Weight: 0.50
, detail
Weight: 0.49
Siblings presence
Weight: 0.32
, scale
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.31
, architecture
Weight: 0.31
, density
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at roof 1.00
be at wall 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, be at wall)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(picture frame, be at wall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(picture frame, be at wall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(footprint, be at roof)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(footprint, be at roof)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(footprint, be at roof)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(footprint, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(picture frame, be at wall)