force: apply to ice hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents task force
Weight: 0.67
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, pressure
Weight: 0.62
, militia
Weight: 0.58
Siblings special force
Weight: 0.69
, delta force
Weight: 0.69
, fear
Weight: 0.67
, power
Weight: 0.67
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
apply to ice hockey 1.00
be used in basketball 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(power, be used in basketball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(power, be used in basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(power, be used in basketball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(force, apply to ice hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(force, be used in basketball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(force, be used in basketball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(force, be used in basketball)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(force, be used in basketball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(force, apply to ice hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(force, apply to ice hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(force, apply to ice hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(power, be used in basketball)