ford: locking hubs work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
locking hubs work 1.00
have locking hubs 0.99
have manual locking hubs 0.94
have locking 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ford, locking hubs work)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ford, have locking hubs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ford, have locking hubs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ford, have manual locking hubs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ford, have manual locking hubs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ford, have locking hubs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ford, have locking hubs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ford, have manual locking hubs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ford, have locking hubs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ford, have locking hubs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ford, have locking hubs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, have locking hubs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ford, have manual locking hubs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ford, locking hubs work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ford, locking hubs work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ford, locking hubs work)