foreigner: were treated in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.68
, time
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings citizen
Weight: 0.61
, french person
Weight: 0.58
, german
Weight: 0.56
, italian
Weight: 0.56
, arab
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in china 1.00
were treated in ancient china 0.94
work in china 0.86
go to china 0.86
were treated in victorian era 0.82
be racist in china 0.80
be treated in korea 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(foreigner, were treated in china)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(foreigner, were treated in ancient china)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(foreigner, were treated in ancient china)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, work in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(foreigner, go to china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in victorian era)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, be racist in china)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foreigner, were treated in ancient china)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(foreigner, be treated in korea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(foreigner, were treated in victorian era)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(foreigner, be racist in china)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(foreigner, were treated in victorian era)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(foreigner, be treated in korea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, go to china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(foreigner, be racist in china)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(foreigner, were treated in victorian era)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(foreigner, go to china)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(foreigner, be racist in china)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, be treated in korea)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(foreigner, be treated in korea)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(foreigner, work in china)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(foreigner, work in china)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(foreigner, go to china)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(foreigner, work in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(foreigner, were treated in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(foreigner, were treated in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(foreigner, were treated in china)