forest: be a part of many tree

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timber
Weight: 0.35
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.33
, natural gas
Weight: 0.32
, wood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of many tree 1.00
has many tree 0.97
be make up of many tree 0.94
be used to tree 0.93
be at tree 0.92
be have from tree 0.92
be get from tree 0.91
be make from tree 0.91
be defined as lot of tree 0.90
be used to cut tree 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wood, be at tree)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wood, be make from tree)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wood, be get from tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wood, be get from tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wood, be get from tree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wood, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wood, be at tree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(wood, be make from tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(wood, be make from tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(forest, be a part of many tree)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(forest, be make up of many tree)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forest, has many tree)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(forest, has many tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(forest, has many tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(forest, be make up of many tree)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forest, be defined as lot of tree)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(forest, be defined as lot of tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(forest, be make up of many tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(forest, has many tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(forest, be defined as lot of tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(forest, be make up of many tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(forest, be defined as lot of tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(forest, be a part of many tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wood, be at tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wood, be make from tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(forest, be a part of many tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wood, be get from tree)