forest: be used to cut down and make paper

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timber
Weight: 0.35
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.33
, natural gas
Weight: 0.32
, wood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to cut down and make paper 1.00
be cut 0.86
be cut with see 0.86
be make into paper 0.84
be cut by saw 0.80
be used to create paper 0.80
be used to cut tree 0.79
burn down 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wood, be make into paper)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wood, be cut with see)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wood, be cut)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wood, be cut by saw)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(wood, be cut with see)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wood, be cut with see)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(wood, be cut)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wood, be cut)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wood, be cut by saw)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wood, be cut by saw)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wood, be make into paper)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wood, be make into paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(forest, burn down)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(forest, burn down)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(forest, burn down)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forest, burn down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wood, be cut)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wood, be cut with see)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wood, be make into paper)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to cut down and make paper)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wood, be cut by saw)