forest: be used to maintain biodiversity

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timber
Weight: 0.35
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.33
, natural gas
Weight: 0.32
, wood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to maintain biodiversity 1.00
be protect from habitat loss 0.79
be find in forest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wood, be find in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be protect from habitat loss)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wildlife, be protect from habitat loss)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be protect from habitat loss)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wood, be find in forest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wood, be find in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wildlife, be protect from habitat loss)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(forest, be used to maintain biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wood, be find in forest)