forest: be vital to life on earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vital to life on earth 1.00
be important to life on earth 0.95
be important to earth 0.90
be useful for human life 0.84
be useful for life 0.82
be important for human being 0.79
be important to animal life 0.79
be important for human beings 0.77
be very important to human beings 0.77
be important to healthy biosphere 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to earth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grassland, be important to earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to earth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(forest, be vital to life on earth)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(forest, be important to life on earth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important to life on earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(forest, be important to life on earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(forest, be important to earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important to earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(forest, be important to life on earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(forest, be important to earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(forest, be important to earth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(forest, be vital to life on earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(forest, be vital to life on earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(forest, be vital to life on earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to earth)