forester: be cheaper than outbacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.53
, position
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.50
, model
Weight: 0.49
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.32
, fireman
Weight: 0.32
, supervisor
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, legislator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than outbacks 1.00
be cheaper than outback 0.81
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(forester, be cheaper than outbacks)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(forester, be cheaper than outback)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(forester, be cheaper than outback)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(forester, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(forester, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(forester, be cheaper than outback)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(forester, be cheaper than outback)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(forester, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(forester, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(forester, be cheaper than outbacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(forester, be cheaper than outbacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(forester, be cheaper than outbacks)