fork: be bad in microwave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tuning fork
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in microwave 1.00
explode in microwave 0.90
spark in microwave 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spoon, explode in microwave)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(spoon, spark in microwave)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(spoon, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(spoon, explode in microwave)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(spoon, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(spoon, spark in microwave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fork, be bad in microwave)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(fork, explode in microwave)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fork, explode in microwave)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(fork, explode in microwave)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fork, spark in microwave)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fork, spark in microwave)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fork, be bad in microwave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(spoon, explode in microwave)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fork, be bad in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(spoon, spark in microwave)