fork: taste like metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tuning fork
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste like metal 1.00
be made of metal 0.84
is made of metal 0.84
be made from metal 0.84
be made from stainless steel 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fork, taste like metal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, taste like metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made from metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fork, taste like metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spoon, taste like metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(spoon, be made from metal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made from metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fork, taste like metal)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fork, be made of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fork, is made of metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fork, be made of metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fork, is made of metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fork, be made from stainless steel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fork, be made of metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fork, is made of metal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fork, be made from metal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fork, be made from stainless steel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fork, be made from metal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fork, be made from metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fork, is made of metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fork, be made from metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fork, be made from stainless steel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fork, be made of metal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fork, be made from stainless steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fork, taste like metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, taste like metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(spoon, be made from metal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(fork, taste like metal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)