form: be at cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, part
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62
, human
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cabinet 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bowl, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bowl, be at cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(form, be at cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(form, be at cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(form, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(form, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bowl, be at cabinet)