form: be beneficial for weight control

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial for weight control 1.00
be benefical for weight control 0.96
be beneficial for wight control 0.87
lose weight 0.83
is beneficial 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(way, lose weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(way, lose weight)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(way, lose weight)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(way, lose weight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(form, be beneficial for weight control)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(form, be benefical for weight control)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(form, be benefical for weight control)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(form, be benefical for weight control)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(form, be beneficial for wight control)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(form, be beneficial for wight control)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(form, be benefical for weight control)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(form, be beneficial for wight control)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(form, be beneficial for wight control)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(way, lose weight)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(form, be beneficial for weight control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(way, lose weight)