form: be in tae kwon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tae kwon 1.00
kung fu 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(register, kung fu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(register, kung fu)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(register, kung fu)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(form, be in tae kwon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(form, be in tae kwon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(form, be in tae kwon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(form, be in tae kwon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(register, kung fu)