formation: be in lakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in lakes 1.00
is lake salty 0.85
be along river 0.78
be along nile river 0.78
be in water 0.78
were built along nile river 0.77
affect river speed 0.77
were built along river 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shape, affect river speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(formation, be in lakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shape, affect river speed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shape, affect river speed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, be in water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shape, affect river speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(formation, be in lakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, be in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, be in water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(formation, be in lakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(formation, be in lakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shape, affect river speed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, be in water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(formation, be in lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shape, affect river speed)